Re: [Discuss] ASSOCIATION UPDATES - Part 2

[carin.thompson]

-----Original Message-----

From:  Juliana Tess <julianaw82@yahoo.com>
Subj:  Re: [Discuss] ASSOCIATION UPDATES - Part 2
Date:  Tue Jan 20, 2009 7:40 am
Size:  1K
To:  Cecelia Howard <cemusiq2006@yahoo.com>
cc:  "discuss@artsalumni.org" <discuss@artsalumni.org>; Paige Furr <paigefurr@yahoo.com>; Terry Loftis <tloftis@vervecommunications.com>; Trez ARTSA <trezmc@baylorhealth.edu>; Angela <angelara@baylorhealth.edu>; Rhonda <rhonda@bohemerockstar.com>; Kim Dover <kpdover@yahoo.com>; "AshlyF. ARTSA" <ashly.fields@phoenix.edu>

We voted in Nov 2008 to wait and take the attorneys advice on wheter to move forward with the old EIN or start a new one with regards to time. After securing the attorney the Board voted to wait until Jan, the date given to us by the attorney, to move forward with her reccommendations. Any of this could have been added to the Dec agenda but no one ever communicated.  
Not cancelling tonights meeting  or uninviting people. There is no need to do that the day of. Once we get through the original agenda from last week, we can talk about all of this mess.    

Sent from my iPod

On Jan 20, 2009, at 6:16 AM, Cecelia Howard <cemusiq2006@yahoo.com wrote:



ALL:
  
 I want to publically apologize NOT for what I said but, for Not Making It Clear what I MEANT.  Emotions were running too high on Tuesday(1/13) meeting. YES, I did say filing New Articles... I DID SPEAK TO THE attorney and confirm what I HAD DONE. However, I did not mean NEW INCORPORATION OR NEW EIN, WE HAVE THE ORIGINAL EIN. We were speaking of amending the original 1996 paperwork. After the December 2008 meeting which was very unproductive except in the opinion of those who ran "your agenda." I spoke to the attorney, again to receive legal counsel giving her two possible scenarios; If the meetings continued as they had during the past 13 months, we would NEVER accomplish anything... 
  
 Many 2008 alum BOD(Board of Directors) preferred not to use the